The peer review process is used to evaluate the content of a manuscript before it is published online. Experts in the relevant field review the manuscript to check its originality, accuracy, and importance. Their feedback helps editors decide whether to publish the manuscript. 

Peer review validates research, sets a standard for quality, and encourages networking within research communities. Even though it may face criticism, it is still the most widely accepted way to verify scientific work. Only manuscripts that follow scientific standards, provide clear reasoning, and include evidence are approved for publication. 

We Follow Double-Blind Peer Review 

Our journal uses a double-blind peer review system. In this process, authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other. The editor assigns the manuscript to reviewers who first check if the paper fits the journal’s scope. Reviewers provide feedback, suggest edits (if needed), and decide whether the manuscript should be accepted, revised, or rejected. 

Submissions with major issues are rejected but can be re-submitted after revisions. A rejection does not mean the work is of low quality; it may simply be outside the journal’s focus or lack originality and innovation. If the reviewer suggests minor changes, the journal will publish the article after the author makes the necessary corrections.